Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Former Ukrainian Soldier agreed for an interview about the reverse side of the war.

UKRAINE SHOULD FORGET ABOUT ME
  
Former Ukrainian Soldier (S), who took part in so-called ATO agreed for an interview with our reporter to tell about the reverse side of the war.
S: Call me Yuras, that’s how they called me in the army. I am now going to leave for Russia in order to get a job according to my profession at one of the factories there. In Ukraine I worked as a 6th grade fitter at an enterprise related to defense. When this damned war started, instead of reserving the highly qualified workers the draft committees started calling us. There were no volunteers among the factory workers. That’s why they started calling us to the factory personnel department trying to persuade us, and after that they simply made us go. Then they started catching people right at the factory entrance sending them to the enlistment offices straight away. So I failed to avoid this, and was not smart enough to leave earlier. That’s how I became a member of one of the military units formed in Dnepropetrovsk region.
Q: So what memories do you have about the service?
S: This can be hardly called service. This is humiliation of people and common sense. They made us live in tents. The whole training program included only marches and shooting at the range. It even took them some time to give weapons to us. The food was poor – grains, fish in swollen cans, condensed milk. Later we got some Polish and American MRE’s, but that was not on a regular basis. Many of the people had to wear their civilian clothing for a long time. Others, including me, receiver military uniform.
Our unit was stationed together with the national guards. I actually noticed myself, and hear others say that no army unit was stationed alone. It would always be either accompanied by the cops from the national guards or the mercenaries from territorial battalions. They act both as retreat-blocking regiments and as security department. They were also the ones getting all the “goodies”. Sometimes our soldiers would be provided uniform, bulletproof vests and packs of food. Then this would be shown to journalists from Kiev, who would make interviews, but after that everything had to be given back to the commanders or the territorial battalions. It was all about fake show. Swinish attitude to us did not change, when we went to the combat zone. They were treating us as cannon fodder. Anyone, who tried to speak up or refused to obey absurd orders would either be arrested or executed. I once witnessed such execution myself.
Q: And you never stood up for your mates?
S: How can you stand up? We were even afraid to be frank with each other, leave alone get organized about anything. Some people could snitch on you out of cowardice, some would do this because of men nature.
Q: have you seen any foreign mercenaries?
S: Mostly I have come across Poles. I also female snipers from some Baltic country, I think they were from Latvia. But strangely enough, they spoke good Russian with no accent. One of them got killed by a booby trap, I don’t know what happened to the other one.
Q: Have you witnessed any lynching of prisoners?
S: I have heard about this, but never saw this myself. We were usually deployed in the field – we were not allowed to go into residential areas. I saw how captured militiamen were convoyed. All of them had bruises and blood stains.
Q: When did you decide to surrender?
S: When we were deployed near Volnovakha, not far from a small village. I braced myself and spoke to one of the locals. He showed me the way to the militia positions. I dropped my rifle and went to surrender unarmed.
Q: How did they treat you?
S: They punched me a couple of times in the heat of the moment, but after that they never beat me again. They kept me in a semi-destroyed house for a couple of days, but they gave me a matrass and a blanket. They fed me the same food they ate. Then they took me to Donetsk, where I and other prisoners were shown ruins of buildings and the city morgue, where torn apart bodies were kept. I never saw such horror even at the front line. After that I decided to never come back to Ukraine. I do not exist either as a soldier or a citizen for Ukraine. Kiev should forget about me.

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

Putin's rating has reached a historical record 89% of Russians are satisfied

June 24, 2015, 13:48

Putin's rating has reached a historical record

 


The activities of Vladimir Putin as president of Russia satisfied 89% of Russians. Such data are "Interfax" referring to the "Levada Center." This figure is an absolute record for the time of the survey.

At the same time, the respondents were asked to name 5-6 politicians and public figures to whom they are most trusted.

First place went to the head of state, his name was called 64% of the respondents.

On the second - Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, a trusted 28% of Russians.

Third - divided Medvedev and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov (21%).

Photo: Press office of the President of Russia

Is the US Looking to Extract Itself From the Ukraine ? The Saker

US May Be Looking to Extract Itself From the Ukraine Quagmire

The Ukraine crisis has not yielded the desired anti-Russian results for Washington and is unlikely to in the future. Meanwhile the dysfunctional country is a liability to any sponsor.

The Saker 
 
Mon, Jun 22  


Direct Russian-US communication channels have been opened for Ukraine

 
Two small news items have not received much attention recently, and yet they might be the signs of something big happening:
Poroshenko has fired the notorious head of the equally notorious Security Service of Ukraine or SBU: Valentin Nalivaichenko.
Sergei Ivanov, the powerful Deputy Prime Minister of Russia has stated that the U.S. and Russia have created a bilateral communications channel on the Ukraine run by Victoria Nuland, Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, for the U.S. and Grigorii Karasin, the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, for Russia. The official reason for that was “not to complicate” the already delicate “Normandy-format”.
So on one hand, we have Kerry and Nuland who came to Russia and who, by all accounts, got nothing of what they asked for but who are now getting a “communications channel”, while at the same time, the 100% U.S.-controlled Nalivaichenko, who is rumored to be an actual CIA agent recruited many years ago, is booted out by Poroshenko. Rumor also has it that Arsen Avakov, the Minister of Internal Affairs, will be next to be kicked out.
These two will now communicate?
There might be no connection here, but my guess is that there is.
The reason why Nalivaichenko was fired is not so much because of the various corruptions scandals he — and all other junta members — were involved in as much as it is Poroshenko’s attempt to place “his” men in all key (power) positions. That, in turn, shows that his regime is getting weaker, not stronger – hence the need to strengthen and consolidate.
I also believe that the Americans are fully aware of this process and this is why they now want a direct channel of communication with Russia: because they fully realize that the only two powers that matter in reality are the U.S. and Russia, especially now that events are getting out of control in Kiev.

One of the best Ukraine specialists out there, Ishchenko, is now saying that the U.S. has concluded that the Ukraine is a total mess and that it is now trying to get out at the least possible cost. I tend to agree with this explanation, though I am not as confident as Ishchenko that we will see this political pullout play out this year.
Because make no mistake: the $300 million allocated by Congress to arm the Ukraine is a joke. A drop of water into a desert. It will change nothing. Most of it will be stolen and the rest will be wasted.
The expected Ukrainian attack on Novorussia has not happened either, and while the rhetoric in Kiev is more bellicose than ever, and while the Ukrainian forces along the line of contact are constantly shelling Novorussia, no real, full scale, attack has happened. Could it be that the Ukrainians are truly afraid of the consequences of an always possible Novorussian counterattack?
It is also becoming increasingly obvious that the U.S. has failed to isolate Russia and that the Russia economy is doing way better than anybody, including the Kremlin, had expected.
So if the Ukraine cannot be used to mount a military attack on Novorussia with the goal of force Russia to intervene, and if the civil war in the Ukraine has failed to produce the kind of isolation and sanctions against Russia which Washington wanted – then what is the use of the Ukraine to Uncle Sam?
Yes, sure, there is the port of Odessa, and some industrial and natural resources that Western corporations will be able to acquire for a fraction of its value, but these benefits pale in comparison with the immense costs of somehow tackling the huge economic, social and political problems of the Ukraine.
It will come to that sooner or later anyway. The U.S. made an unholy mess of Afghanistan, Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and it always ended up getting out, at least politically.  Why should it be different for the Ukraine?
I submit that if the U.S. analysts came to the conclusion that there is no hope of forcing Russia to sent her forces into the Donbass then the Ukraine becomes useless. The chances of Russia doing so appear to be very close to zero right now. True, there is the very dangerous situation in Transnistria which might, really, force Russia to intervene, but for some reason the U.S. does not seem to be eager to trigger an immediate crisis. Could it be that the U.S. is holding Transnistria as a bargaining chip against Russia in a  “you don’t make things too bad for us or else…” kind of strategy? Maybe. I honestly don’t know.
It will be interesting to see of Avakov get’s booted out next and how the various Ukrainian nazi death-squads will react to the firing of their patrons in Kiev.

Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Ukraine’s Pres. Poroshenko Says Overthrow of Yanukovych Was a Coup

Ukraine’s Pres. Poroshenko Says Overthrow of Yanukovych Was a Coup

Viktor Yanukovych
Yulia Tymoshenko
Petro Poroshenko
Viktor Yushchenko
Arseniy Yatsenyuk


Eric Zuesse
06/22/2015

Ukraine’s President Petro Poroshenko requests the supreme court of Ukraine to declare that his predecessor, Viktor Yanukovych, was overthrown by an illegal operation; in other words, that the post-Yanukovych government, including Poroshenko’s own Presidency, came into power from a coup, not from something democratic, not from any authentic constitutional process at all.

In a remarkable document, which is not posted at the English version of the website of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, but which is widelyreported outside the United States, including Russia, Poroshenko, in Ukrainian (not in English), has petitioned the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (as it is being widely quoted in English):

"I ask the court to acknowledge that the law ‘on the removal of the presidential title from Viktor Yanukovych' as unconstitutional.”

I had previously reported, and here will excerpt, Poroshenko’s having himself admitted prior to 26 February 2014, to the EU’s investigator, and right after the February 22nd overthrow of Yanukovych, that the overthrow was a coup, and that it was even a false-flag operation, in which the snipers, who were dressed as if they were Ukrainian Security Bureau troops, were actually not, and that, as the EU’s investigator put his finding to the EU’s chief of foreign affairs Catherine Ashton [and with my explanatory annotations here]:

"the same oligarch [Poroshenko — and so when he became President he already knew this] told that well, all the evidence shows that the people who were killed by snipers, from both sides, among policemen and people from the streets, [this will shock Ashton, who had just said that Yanukovych had masterminded the killings] that they were the same snipers, killing people from both sides [so, Poroshenko himself knows that his regime is based on a false-flag U.S.-controlled coup d’etat against his predecessor]. ... Behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovych, but it was somebody from the new coalition.”

This was when Ashton first learned that the myth that Yanukovych had been overthrown as a result of public outrage at his having rejected the EU’s offer of membership to Ukraine was just a hoax. (Actually, the planning for this coup was already under way in the U.S. Embassy by at least early 2013, well prior to Yanukovych’s EU decision. Furthermore,the Ukrainian public’s approval of the government peaked right after Yanukovych announced his rejection of the EU’s offer, but then the U.S.-engineered “Maidan” riots caused that approval to plunge.)

If the Court grants Poroshenko’s petition, then the appointment of Arseniy Yatsenyuk by the U.S. State Department’s Victoria Nuland on 4 February 2014, which was confirmed by the Ukrainian parliament (or Rada) at the end of the coup on February 26th, and the other appointments which were made, including that of Oleksandr Turchynov to fill in for Yanukovych as caretaker President until one of the junta’s chosen candidates would be ‘elected’ on May 25th of 2014, which ‘election’ Poroshenko won — all of this was illegal.

However, this illegality had already been known. It was already explained in detail on 28 February 2014, that, “Yanukovych’s removal was unconstitutional.” That’s for lawyers; but, now, finally, Ukraine’s Constitutional Court is faced with the shocking predicament of Ukraine’s own President, who won his post as a result of this coup, requesting them to “acknowledge” that it was a coup, much as the founder of the "private CIA" firm Stratfor had even called it, “the most blatant coup in history.” (It was that because the authentic video and other evidence of its having been a Washington job was so massive.)

Also in the news now is that Dmitriy Yarosh's Right Sector — the same group that Washington had hired for the coup and for the ethnic cleansing campaign in Ukraine’s former Donbass region — haveannounced that they will assemble in Kiev on July 3rd to overthrow Petroshenko unless he restarts right now the war against Donbass. The people whom Washington paid to oust Yanukovych are planning to do the same to Poroshenko. There is a struggle inside the Obama Administrationabout how far they can successfully go with their Ukrainian nazis not formally leading the country. Washington is having a hard time keeping in line the Ukrainian nazis upon whom Washington’s plan for Ukraine has been based. Ukraine’s nazis are thirsting for Russian blood, and want to slake their thirst faster than the Obama Administration is willing to go along with. Washington’s previous “F—k the EU!” hasn’t worked as well as they had hoped. There is thus increasingly bad blood between the Obama Administration and the Ukrainian enforcers upon whom Obama has been relying. Basically, Poroshenko now is torn between the EU, on one side, and Ukraine’s well-armed nazis, on the other; and, thus far, the ultimate decider, U.S. President Obama, who has needed cooperation both from Ukraine’s nazis and from the EU, in order for his Ukrainian gambit against Russia to work, is on the fence between those two sides. John Kerry sides with the EU; Victoria Nuland sides with the nazis. But Obama himself hasn’t yet played his hand.

#Ukraine an Economic Failed State

#Ukraine an Economic Failed State


Alexander Rogers: Etalon Sverhnaglosti - likely the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine wants to cheat Western creditors out of 30 billion Dollars and I finally was able to understand the intricacies of the mad logic of the Kiev regime in the economic sphere anyway. 

To understand where they are going to get the money to meet their unrealistic plans. Let me remind you that Yaresko and her accomplices argued, (following the recommendations of the IMF), that they increased their gold reserves by the end of the year to $ 18.3 billion. I still could not understand where they going to take the money - in fact no visible source for this is not shown, and the Ministry of Economic Development downgraded the outlook for economic recession from -5% to -7.5%. 

She did so only after a deterioration of the forecasts of the IMF and World Bank, who believe that the drop will be 9%. And then came a fresh application Yaresko and I understand their "logic." They are not going to earn it, they plan to write it all off! 

But let's inspect the details.The Ministry of Finance of Ukraine requires (not asking for that would be appropriate in this situation, namely the need), creditors to write off $ 15.3 billion of debt. Lenders to this disagree, and instead suggest that the NBU has spent on the repayment of debt of $ 8 billion (which, for obvious reasons, does not agree already Kiev junta). 

The current gold reserves of the NBU account for about $ 9 billion. If they have to pay $ 8 billion to creditors, then there's just virtually is nothing left - not enough to ensure the ongoing operations of export-import, or to ensure the hryvnia according to the monetarist principles (which now formally need about $ 40 billion). The IMF has these money plans - they want the gold reserves of Ukraine served as collateral for debts to the IMF, and not for the debts of private creditors. 

What's the point of view of the past (and in general) - simple Kidalovo?  But even if all of a sudden there would be a miracle, a divine intervention, and the creditors committee will write off Kiev's $ 15 billion debt, international reserves this does not increase to $ 18.3, they will remain at $ 9 billion . 

Kiev in their calculations novice accountant makes a mistake - makes the operation of this amount TWICE - once subtracts debt a second time adds to inventory! However, if the operations are carried out with the amount of $ 15.3 billion, that is why the result is not $ 24, 3 billion, but only $ 18.3 billion? And because another $ 6 billion Kiev is going to pull, because the gold reserves of Ukraine steadily falling. That is the end of the year even if the write-off of debts on the balance sheet will remain $ 18.3 billion, according to the plans to the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, but only about $ 3 billion. 

Of course , the amount is not exact, because on the one hand, some planned revenues from privatization urgent (but not significant, because the country preddefoltnom buy assets at full price will not be), and on the other - deep budget deficits, and the funds will go to compensate for this deficit. But in general, the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine is trying to "cheat" surrounding the amount of 30 (15 + 15) billion dollars, showing better performance than they are not only there, but also what they can be. 

I do not think that this primitive mistake could happen by accident, most likely a deliberate sell (the leadership and the Ministry of Finance still speculating on CDS). As forecasts about the sudden growth of Ukraine's GDP in the first quarter of the following year (from what suddenly?). And, most likely, this attempt Nadur with all reporting takes place with the consent of the IMF, which expects so throw private creditors. 

However, the market is not so easy Nadur (especially such shabby tricks), there sits a huge number of qualified specialists.Therefore, Ukrainian bonds only in recent days lost about 10% of its value.

Help Novorossia! Together - liberty and justice can win out over fascism!

Humanitarian aid Donbass | Gumbat Novorossia




TRUTH ABOUT BLOCKADE DONBASA: As it seems the people of Donbass, getting worse longer is possible by the simple lack of sustenance..! However, the Ukrainian government, with the skill of an experienced Gestapo officer, every day comes up with newer and newer ways to "torture" the ordinary people. 
What are the realities for a miner on earth today? Fierce shelling of peaceful neighborhoods, hospitals overflowing of the victims and the wounded, killing of innocent men, women, children, and the elderly. 
Ukrainian authorities for more than a year do not pay the benefits earned by honest labor and pensions. In all checkpoints from Ukraine to the DNI-LC does not pass any food, medicine and even humanitarian aid. 
Completely closed travel passenger transport, ten-turn doomed passenger cars, multi-kilometer distances people go on foot to exercise their legitimate right of free movement, and to see friends and relatives on the other side "of the fence." 
What are the Ukrainian authorities hoping, that people will be asked to give back the Donbass? Back into the country that terrorized them, and which created such atrocities within them? What else to expect from a sick fantasy Ukrainian junta?
Thousands of families DNI and LC are left without a roof over their head. Now without the help of caring people, without the support of charities they will not survive in this difficult time. We are grateful to the people of Russia and other states for help and assistance, but let's face it - this assistance is not enough to support people who have been victims of genocide in the Donbas. 


Therefore, we have to turn again and again to the hearts and souls of compassionate people, asking them to provide financial and material assistance for the purchase of basic necessities. 
List of requirements: 
1. Food (cereals, pasta, canned meat and fish, vegetable oil, tea, cookies). 
2. Baby food (a mixture of up to 1 year, 1 year, cereal, puree, juices). 
3. Diapers and disposable diapers for adults and children. 
4. Personal hygiene products (shampoo, soap, towels, baby cream, toothpaste, toothbrush, shaving foam, shaving machine). 
We sincerely thank all those who have assisted Novorossia! Together - liberty and justice can win over fascism! 
To assist residents of Donbass: http://gumbat.ru/donate 
Foundation for Catherine Gubareva VTB24 (PSC) Branch №2351 in Krasnodar p / a 40703810728050005527 BIC 040349585 K / s 30101810900000000585 BIN 1146100002751 INN 6123017206 PPC 612,301,001Savings Russia (Map): 4276 5200 1124 6069 Yandex Money: 410,012,478,850,907 (translation without patronage) Western Union, MoneyGram: (name of the recipient to request further Email bf.gumbat@yandex.ru
Contact Humanitarian battalion Novorossia Donetsk: gumbatdn@yandex.ru Rostov on-Don: +7 988 94 07 605;lgc.novorossia@list.ru Skype: lgc.novorossia Your assistance helps people to survive besieged.

Monday, June 8, 2015

RESULTS "EUROMAIDAN": THE COMPLETE ABSENCE OF LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS

RESULTS "EUROMAIDAN": THE COMPLETE ABSENCE OF LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Monday, June 8, 2015 Author antifa

Results "euromaidan": the complete absence of law and human rights


It so happened in this world, that any unjust act returns to its instigators boomerang with triple at least stopping power. Moreover, ignorance of the law, as well as what they are doing, does not relieve perpetrators from responsibility. Payback comes inevitable. Ukrainian social and political activist, a human rights activist, a member of the Ukrainian Helsinki Group states that "Maidan" falsely and cynically pretending to be a substance that fought the dictatorship, the time has come to get acquainted with this dictatorship.


This is a human rights activist wrote in the social network immediately ensuing acceleration and the defeat of the tent city on the Maidan, who arranged the new generation of protesters.


"Independence, that is, the uprising began December 1, 2013 as a protest against crackdown" euromaidan "on November 30. That is - against the violation of freedom of assembly. Today it became clear that the Ukrainians have reached as a result of the Maidan - a complete absence of freedom of assembly .

As if we did not belong to those who gathered yesterday at the Independence (a "Evromaydanu" too ambiguous attitude), Ukrainians were, until recently, the right to express their views on matters of public concern, such as the attitude of the president and the government. Now - no.


Those cops same titushki. Only now everything is much worse than the "laws of January 16th." Now, there are no laws and rights "- is reasonable, but very sad Chemeris says human rights activist.


Recall tent city appeared on the central square in Kiev on Sunday, June 7th day. Its members were unarmed and only demanded that the president of Petro Poroshenko and the Ukrainian government to provide a report on its work. However, on the night of June 8, unknown masked thugs demolished the tents on Independence Square activists. According to eyewitnesses, the attackers were from 50 to 100 people. The authorities pretend that they do not know who took to disperse new Maidan. In avakovskoy police initially reported that they had de under investigation in the case. After a short time, and only one and a half years after the "Revolution gidnosty" new victims of arbitrary power, is going to ask her all the questions simmering, called them "provocateurs" and "agents of the Kremlin", and metropolitan police detained "pending clarification" did not attack, and one of the organizers of the "Maidan 3.0". Hastily have reported to the police and that in the tents of protesters were found alcohol bottles and syringes, law enforcement easily retrained disgruntled outrage in drug addicts and alcoholics. So ends with "gidnosty Revolution", which is not and never has been. But the "banquet" achievements "euromaidan" certainly goes on and we will have plenty more news about his stunning conquest.


Подробнее: http://antifashist.com/item/itogi-evromajdana-polnoe-otsutstvie-zakonov-i-prav.html#ixzz3cUL9h5WO

In Kiev, #US mercenary Nazis destroyed a camp Maidan activists

In Kiev, #US mercenary Nazis destroyed a camp Maidan activists 
In Kiev, destroyed a camp Maidan activists - those who are against the current government.
Restless night in Kiev. They broke up the new Square. Their tents, flags and banners dare masked men, with a night raid was not unexpected. At least for the police that the thugs for simply watching. Detentions then yet begun. But sent to the station, as a rule, are not those who attack and those on whom to attack.
On the eve of the tent people would not leave even for a moment - they were afraid that they will be removed. There was a lot of retired women. With one voice they said, would sit on the Maidan until their demands are not heeded the country's leaders.





Sahra Wagenknecht: "The Poles fucking leg! You forget who you turned off the furnace at Auschwitz?

Sahra Wagenknecht: "The Poles fucking leg! You forget who you turned off the furnace at Auschwitz?

The children appeared an insult: "You're worse than Conchita!" How exactly children feel the surrounding world.

It is a pity that the Soviet army did not win at the end of the war the whole of Europe! I do not have time. Zhukov offered to do it. But America and its allies to open a second front, fearing Soviet Army. As far as the Soviet power was more decent than the current European political hypocrisy and the alleged tolerance.

Is it possible to imagine that the children's program of the "Good night, kids!" During the Soviet era were not bunny with a piglet, a stream of urine and Turd, as in some European Union countries? Europe has become a Sodom and Gomorrah. And the punishment should be for Europe like the biblical! Nothing interested in Europe, in addition to profit and business! And this is immoral. You can argue with me all you want, but, by God, Stalin, who fought against the bourgeois mind, this was right.

Today, do not hesitate to defile the most that neither is sacred, forgetting that it was the Soviet Army liberated the majority of concentration camps. And these conversations that Ukrainians liberated Auschwitz, if only because no sense that in the Soviet Army there was no conflict between nationalities. There was one nationality - Soviet man. And Ukrainians, Belarusians and Russian general no one shared. But it does not fit in the minds of the Obama Merkel and Hollande. They raised poop and urine stream, energized tolerant dismemberment giraffes and rear-wheel victory bearded Conchita a musical contest.

All these indignant words I wrote after reading the following article. Good for you, Sarah!

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov called the statement of its Polish counterpart Grzegorz Schetyna that liberated Auschwitz Ukrainian soldiers "blasphemous" and "cynical", reports on Thursday, January 22 RIA Novosti.

A similar statement was made by the official and the Russian Foreign Ministry. As published on the website address, the Russian ministry said that "it is difficult to suspect a public servant such as the level of Grzegorz Schetyna in ignorance," in a time when "it is well known that Auschwitz was freed the Red Army, as part of which fought heroically all nationalities."

On Wednesday, January 21, Foreign Minister of Poland Grzegorz Schetyna broadcast Polskie Radio reported that the operation to liberate the concentration camp Auschwitz-Birkenau in Auschwitz were carried out by Ukrainians. According to him, Ukrainian soldiers "in the January day opened the gates of the camp."

Sahra Wagenknecht: "The Poles fucking leg! You forget who you turned off the furnace at Auschwitz? Or are you fitting for ukrovskih Nazis are looking for someone who would like to remind you how they work? "

Several German non-governmental organizations protested against the refusal of the invitation of Russian President Vladimir Putin at a commemorative ceremony to mark the 70th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi death camp of Auschwitz by Soviet troops. The statements of these organizations issued a left German newspaper Junge Welt.

In particular, the organization "Communist Platform", a member of the parliamentary party "The Left," has made a statement which strongly criticized the fact that the Russian leader was not invited to the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. The statement is required to respect the 27 million Soviet citizens who died in the struggle against fascism and officially invited Russian President Vladimir Putin at the commemorative events at Auschwitz (located on the territory of Poland). The statement has been signed, in particular, the Deputy Chairman of the "Left" in the Bundestag Sahra Wagenknecht, member of the Bundestag Volkmar Vogel, as well as former German Finance Minister Oskar Lafontaine.

The letter's authors believe that the Polish authorities decided to start rewriting history, against a monstrous hatred of Russia, which replicate the Western media. The signatories also pointed to the statement by Efraim Zuroff, head of the Israeli branch of the Simon Wiesenthal Center (center for human rights, counter-terrorism, anti-Semitism and the Holocaust), who published an article on January 14, which said that only Soviet troops liberated Auschwitz and played a major role in the victory over Nazi Germany. The only one, according to Zuroff, deserves to attend the anniversary ceremony because it Russian President Vladimir Putin.

A former deputy head of the leftist Sahra Wagenknecht made in the Bundestag sharply criticized Chancellor Angela Merkel's policy towards Russia. The MP accused the Chancellor to follow the instructions from Washington and neglecting national interests.

"Mrs Merkel, there is something that you think more important than the interests of German business: the interests of the US government and American business.

In your speech in Sydney, Mrs Merkel, you are afraid resented the fact that 25 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall still exists the old thinking in terms of "spheres of influence", to wipe their feet on the international law.

Then one wonders: Mrs. Merkel, you generally inhabited?

And where you lived the past 25 years, where were you when the United States trampled on international law in Iraq to expand its sphere of influence on Iraqi oil? Where were you when the bomb Libya? When they are arming the Syrian opposition, including LIH? This was in accordance with international law?

You drove Germany reissue of "cold war" with Russia, the economic war unleashed senseless, that hurts in the first place the German and European economy.

In Ukraine, you cooperate with the regime, in which the functions of the police and security services are performed reliably attested by the Nazis. Rather than mess with these thugs, we need a foreign policy, for which the security and peace in Europe will be more important than the instructions from Washington

Go back to the path of diplomacy, the lifting of sanctions. Finish the game with fire! "

Wagenknecht Merkel sums up the policy: "You lose all the legacy of detente and Europe led to a new Cold War, to the danger of the spread of fire, because you did not have the courage to confront the US government. Our citizens deserve the best policy - good-neighborliness with all its neighbors in Europe. "

Sunday, June 7, 2015

Audit FIFA confirmed the right of Russia to host 2018 World Cup

Audit FIFA confirmed the right of Russia to host 2018 World Cup
June 7, 2015


FIFA did not find violations of the election hosts the 2018 World Cup and the 2022 World Cup. This was announced by Chairman of the Audit Organization Domenico Scala.

The organization conducted a special audit, which confirmed that the vote took place honestly.

Rock also said that he knew nothing about the investigation, which makes the FBI.

"I do not know anything. If FIFA knew some details, they would have informed me, as the head of the audit committee, "- said the official.

Earlier, a Swiss prosecutor's office opened a criminal investigation for possible violations of the election. The FBI is conducting its own investigation and had arrested a group of high-ranking FIFA officials.

Photo: Andy Müller / RIA Novosti
http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201506072348-g05y.htm#

Vladimir Putin gave an interview to the newspaper Il Corriere della Sera June 6, 2015

Interview to the Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera

Ahead of his visit to Italy, Vladimir Putin gave an interview to the newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.
09:00
With journalists Paolo Valentino (left) and Luciano Fontana.
With journalists Paolo Valentino (left) and Luciano Fontana.With journalists Paolo Valentino (left) and Luciano Fontana.
President of Russia Vladimir Putin: Good evening.
Luciano Fontana: Good evening, Mr President. First of all, we would like to thank you for giving us this important opportunity to interview you today.
Vladimir Putin: It is my pleasure.
Luciano Fontana: My name is Luciano Fontana. I am the new head of Il Corriere della Sera, and here with me is my colleague, Paolo Valentino, who worked for a long time in Russia and even married a Russian woman.
Vladimir Putin: You are the new head of the newspaper?
Luciano Fontana: Yes, it has only been a month.
Vladimir Putin: Congratulations you on the appointment.
Luciano Fontana: Thank you very much, Mr Putin.
I would like to start with a question concerning Russian-Italian relations. This relationship has always been close and privileged, both in the economic and political spheres. However, it has been somewhat marred by the crisis in Ukraine and the sanctions.
Could the recent visit by Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi to Russia and your upcoming visit to Milan somehow change this trend, and if so, what is needed for that?
Vladimir Putin: First, I firmly believe that Russia was not responsible for the deterioration in relations between our country and the EU states. This was not our choice; it was dictated to us by our partners. It was not we who introduced restrictions on trade and economic activities. Rather, we were the target and we had to respond with retaliatory, protective measures.
But the relationship between Russia and Italy has, indeed, always been privileged, both in politics and the economy. For instance, in recent years, that is, in the last couple of years, trade between our countries increased elevenfold, from what I believe was $4.2 billion – we make calculations in US dollars – to over $48 billion, nearly $49 billion.
There are 400 Italian companies operating in Russia. We are cooperating actively in the energy sector, in an array of fields. Italy is the third largest consumer of our energy resources. We also have many joint high technology projects: in the space and aircraft industries, and in many other sectors. Russian regions are working very closely with Italy. Last year, almost a million Russian tourists, about 900,000, visited Italy. And while there, they spent over a billion euro.
We have always enjoyed trust-based relations in the political sphere as well. The establishment of the Russia-NATO Council was Italy's initiative – Silvio Berlusconi was Prime Minister at the time. This advisory working body no doubt became an important factor of security in Europe. In this regard, Italy has always contributed greatly to the development of the dialogue between Russia and Europe, and NATO as a whole. Not to mention our special cultural and humanitarian cooperation.
All this, of course, lays the foundation for a special relationship between our countries. And the incumbent Prime Minister’s visit to Russia sent a very important message showing that Italy is willing to develop these relations. It is only natural that this does not go unnoticed either by the Government of the Russian Federation or by the public.
We are, of course, ready to reciprocate and go further in expanding our cooperation as long as our Italian partners are willing to do the same. I hope that my upcoming visit to Milan will help in this respect.
Interview to the Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.
Interview to the Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.
Interview to the Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.
Luciano Fontana: I would like to satisfy my curiosity and ask you one more question about Italy.
You have known several chairmen of the Italian Council of Ministers – Romano Prodi, Silvio Berlusconi, Massimo D'Alema and Matteo Renzi. With whom did you find that you understood each other best? And how much, in your opinion, does the existence of a personal relationship – like the one you had with Silvio Berlusconi – contribute to good relations between countries?
Vladimir Putin: No matter what posts we occupy or what our jobs are, we are still human, and personal trust is certainly a very important factor in our work, in building relations on the interstate level. One of the people you have just mentioned once told me, “You must be the only person (meaning I was the only person) – who has a friendly relationship with both Berlusconi and Prodi.” I can tell you that it was not difficult for me, I still don’t find it difficult, and I can tell you why. My Italian partners have always put the interests of Italy, of the Italian people, first and believed that in order to serve the interests of their country, including economic and political interests, they must maintain friendly relations with Russia. We have always understood and felt that.
This has been the key element underlying our good relations. I have always sensed a truly sincere interest in building interstate relations irrespective of the domestic political situation. I would like to say in this regard that the attitude people in Russia have developed towards Italy does not depend on which political party is in power.
Paolo Valentino: Mr President, you are coming to Milan for the celebration of the Russia Day at the Universal Exhibition EXPO 2015. The core theme of this year’s exhibition is “Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life.” What is Russia’s contribution to this cause? What does this effort mean for relations between states?
Vladimir Putin: This is one of the major challenges that humanity is facing today. So I can and must acknowledge that the Italian organisers chose one of the key themes for the exhibition.
The world's population is growing. According to experts, it will reach 9 billion people by 2050. But even today, according to the same sources, to the UN, 850 million people all over the planet are under‑nourished or starving, and 100 million of them are children. So, there is no doubt that this is one of the key issues of our time. Many other issues, seemingly unrelated, will depend on how we deal with it. I am talking about instability among other things, that is political instability of entire regions, terrorism, and so on. All these problems are interrelated. The surge of illegal migration that has hit Italy and Europe today is among these resulting problems. I would like to repeat that, in my view, the organisers did the right thing pointing out the need to address this issue.
As for Russia's contribution, we channel over $200 million into this through UN programmes. Many countries around the world receive necessary support and assistance under these programmes using Russian resources.
We pay significant attention to the development of agriculture in our country. Notwithstanding all the difficulties that the development of Russian economy faces today, our agricultural sector, the sector of agricultural production, has been growing steadily – last year the growth was around 3.4‑3.5 percent. In the first quarter of the current year, the growth stayed at the same level, exceeding 3 percent, at 3.4 percent. Russia is now the third largest grain exporter in the world. Last year, we had a record harvest of grain crops, one of the largest in recent years – 105.3 million tonnes. Finally, Russia has an enormous potential in this sphere. I think that we have the largest area of arable land in the world and the biggest fresh water reserves, since Russia is the biggest country in the world in terms of territory.
Paolo Valentino: Thank you, Mr Putin.
When we were talking about the shadow cast on our relations, you said that it was not your choice, and there is an opinion that Russia feels betrayed, abandoned by Europe, like a lover abandoned by his mistress. What are the problems in our relations today? Do you think that Europe has been too dependent on the United States in the Ukrainian crisis? What do you expect from Europe in relation to the sanctions? I may have asked too many questions at once.
Vladimir Putin: You have certainly asked a lot of questions, with an Italian flair. (Laughs)
First, about the mistress. In this kind of a relationship with a woman, that is, if you assume no obligations, you have no right to claim any obligations from your partner.
We have never viewed Europe as a mistress. I am quite serious now. We have always proposed a serious relationship. But now I have the impression that Europe has actually been trying to establish material‑based relations with us, and solely for its own gain. There is the notorious Third Energy Package and the denial of access for our nuclear energy products to the European market despite all the existing agreements. There is reluctance to acknowledge the legitimacy of our actions and reluctance to cooperate with integration associations in the territory of the former Soviet Union. I am referring to the Customs Union, which we created and which has now grown into the Eurasian Economic Union.
Because it is all right when integration takes place in Europe, but if we do the same in the territory of the former Soviet Union, they try to explain it by Russia's desire to restore an empire. I don’t understand the reasons for such an approach.
You see, all of us, including me, have been talking for a long time about the need to establish a common economic space stretching from Lisbon to Vladivostok. In fact, French President Charles de Gaulle said something similar a lot earlier than me. Today nobody objects to it, everybody says: yes, we should aspire to this.
But what is happening in practice? For example, the Baltic States have joined the European Union. Good, no problem. But today we are being told that these countries, which are part of the energy system of the former Soviet Union and Russia, they must join the European Union’s energy system. We ask: Are there any problems with energy supply or with something else? Why is it necessary? – No, there are no problems, but we have decided that it will be better this way.
What does this mean for us in practical terms? It means that we will be forced to build additional generating capacities in some western regions in Russia. Since electricity transmission lines went through the Baltic States to some Russian regions and vice versa, all of them will now be switched over to Europe, and we will have to build new transmission lines in our country to ensure electricity supply. This will cost us about 2‑2.5 billion euro.
Now let’s look at the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement. It does not require that Ukraine becomes part of the European energy system, but it is considered possible. If this happens, we will have to spend not 2‑2.5 billion but, probably, about 8‑10 billion euro for the same purpose. The question is: why is this necessary if we believe in building a common economic space from Lisbon to Vladivostok? What is the objective of the European Union’s Eastern Partnership? Is it to integrate the whole former Soviet Union into a single space with Europe, I repeat for the third time, from Lisbon to Vladivostok, or to cut something off and establish a new border between modern Russia and the western territories including, say, Ukraine and Moldova?
Let me tell you something else now, and you can decide for yourselves what to publish and what to leave out.
What are the roots of the Ukrainian crisis? Its cause seems to be completely disproportionate to what has become an utter tragedy today claiming many lives in southeast Ukraine. What sparked the crisis? Former President Viktor Yanukovych said that he needed to think about signing Ukraine’s Association Agreement with the EU, possibly make some changes and hold consultations with Russia, its major trade and economic partner. In this connection or under this pretext riots broke out in Kiev. They were actively supported both by our European and American partners. Then a coup d'état followed – a totally anti-constitutional act. The new authorities announced that they were going to sign the Association Agreement but would delay its implementation until January 1, 2016. The question is: what was the coup d'état for? Why did they need to escalate the situation to a civil war? The result is exactly the same.
What is more, at the end of 2013 we were ready to give Ukraine $15 billion as a state loan supported by a further $5 billion via commercial banks; plus we already gave it $3 billion during the year and promised to cut gas prices by half if they paid regularly. We were not at all against Ukraine signing an Association Agreement with the European Union. But, of course, we wanted to participate in the final decisions, meaning that Ukraine was then and is still now, today, a member of the CIS free trade area, and we have mutual obligations as its members.
How is it possible to completely ignore this, to treat it with utter disrespect? I simply cannot understand that. The result that we have – a coup d'état, a civil war, hundreds of lives lost, devastated economy and social sphere, a four-year $17.5 billion loan promised to Ukraine by the IMF and complete disintegration of economic ties with Russia. But Russian and Ukrainian economies are very deeply interconnected.
The European Union unilaterally removed its customs duties for Ukraine. However, the volume of Ukraine’s sales to the European market did not grow. Why not? Because there is nothing to sell. There is no demand in the European market for Ukrainian products, either in terms of quality or price, in addition to the products that were already sold before.
We have a market for Ukraine, but many ties have been severed unilaterally by the Ukrainian side. For example, all engines for our combat helicopters came from Ukraine. Now deliveries have stopped. We have already built one plant in St Petersburg and another plant will be completed this year, but the production of these engines in Ukraine will be shut down because Italy, France or Germany don’t need and will never need such engines. It is impossible for Ukraine to divert its production in any way; it will need billions in investment to do this.
I don’t understand why this was done. I have asked many of my colleagues, including in Europe and America, about it.
During interview to Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.
During interview to Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.
During interview to Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.
Paolo Valentino: And what do they answer?
Vladimir Putin: The situation got out of control.
You know, I would like to tell you and your readers one thing. Last year, on February 21, President Yanukovych and the Ukrainian opposition signed an agreement on how to proceed, how to organise political life in the country, and on the need to hold early elections. They should have worked to implement this agreement, especially since three European foreign ministers signed this agreement as guarantors of its implementation.
If those colleagues were used for the sake of appearances and they were not in control of the situation on the ground, which was in fact in the hands of the US ambassador or a CIA resident, they should have said: “You know, we did not agree to a coups d'etat, so we will not support you; you should go and hold elections instead.”
The same could be said about our American partners. Let’s assume that they also lost control of the situation. But if America and Europe had said to those who had taken these unconstitutional actions: ”If you come to power in such a way, we will not support you under any circumstances; you must hold elections and win them” – (by the way, they had a 100‑percent chance of a victory, everybody knows that), the situation would have developed in a completely different way.
So, I believe that this crisis was created deliberately and it is the result of our partner’s unprofessional actions. And the coverage of this process has been absolutely unacceptable. I would like to emphasise once more: this was not our choice, we did not seek it, we are simply forced to respond to what is happening.
In conclusion – forgive me for this protracted monologue – I would like to say that it is not that we feel deceived or treated unfairly. This is not the point. The point is that relationships should be built on a long‑term basis not in the atmosphere of confrontation, but in the spirit of cooperation.
Paolo Valentino: You say the situation got out of control. But is it not the right moment for Russia to seize the initiative, to find a way to engage its American and European partners in the search of solution to the situation, to show that it is ready to address this problem?
Vladimir Putin: That is exactly what we are doing. I think that today the document we agreed upon in Minsk, called Minsk‑II, is the best agreement and perhaps the only unequivocal solution to this problem. We would never have agreed upon it if we had not considered it to be right, just and feasible.
On our part, we take every effort, and will continue to do so, in order to influence the authorities of the unrecognised self-proclaimed Donetsk and Lugansk republics. But not everything depends on us. Our European and US partners should exert influence on the current Kiev administration. We do not have the power, as Europe and the United States do, to convince Kiev to carry out everything that was agreed on in Minsk.
I can tell you what needs to be done; maybe I will anticipate your next question. The key aspect of the political settlement was to create conditions for this joint work, but it was essential to stop the hostilities, to pull back heavy weaponry. On the whole, this has been done. Unfortunately, there is still shooting occasionally and there are casualties, but there are no large‑scale hostilities, the sides have been separated. It is time to begin implementing the Minsk Agreements.
Specifically, there needs to be a constitutional reform to ensure the autonomous rights of the unrecognised republics. The Kiev authorities do not want to call it autonomy, they prefer different terms, such as decentralisation. Our European partners, those very partners who wrote the corresponding clause in the Minsk Agreements, explained what should be understood as decentralisation. It gives them the right to speak their language, to have their own cultural identity and engage in cross‑border trade – nothing special, nothing beyond the civilised understanding of ethnic minorities’ rights in any European country.
A law should be adopted on municipal elections in these territories and a law on amnesty. All this should be done, as the Minsk Agreements read, in coordination with Donetsk People's Republic and Lugansk People's Republic, with these territories.
The problem is that the current Kiev authorities don’t even want to sit down to talks with them. And there is nothing we can do about it. Only our European and American partners can influence this situation. There is no need to threaten us with sanctions. We have nothing to do with this, this is not our position. We seek to ensure the implementation of the Minsk Agreements.
It is essential to launch economic and social rehabilitation of these territories. What has happened there, exactly? The current Kiev authorities have simply cut them off from the rest of the country. They discontinued all social payments – pensions, benefits; they cut off the banking system, made regular energy supply impossible, and so on. So you see, there is a humanitarian disaster in those regions. And everybody is pretending that nothing is wrong.
Our European colleagues have taken on certain obligations, in particular they promised to help restore the banking system in these territories. Finally, since we are talking about what can or must be done, and by whom, I believe that the European Union could surely provide greater financial assistance to Ukraine. These are the main points.
I would like to stress that Russia is interested in and will strive to ensure the full and unconditional implementation of the Minsk Agreements, and I don’t believe there is any other way to settle this conflict today.
Incidentally, the leaders of the self-proclaimed republics have publicly stated that under certain conditions – meaning the implementation of the Minsk Agreements – they are ready to consider themselves part of the Ukrainian state. This is a fundamental issue. I think this position should be viewed as a sound precondition for the start of substantial negotiations.
Paolo Valentino: So you are saying that it is out of the question for the Crimean scenario to be repeated in eastern Ukraine?
Vladimir Putin: You know, the Crimean scenario does not reflect Russia’s position; it reflects the position of the people who live in Crimea.
All our actions, including those with the use of force, were aimed not at tearing away this territory from Ukraine but at giving the people living there an opportunity to express their opinion on how they want to live their lives.
I would like to stress this once again, as I have said many times before: if Kosovo Albanians were allowed this, why is it prohibited to Russians, Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars living in Crimea? And by the way, the decision on Kosovo’s independence was made exclusively by the Kosovo Parliament, whereas Crimea held a region-wide referendum. I think that a conscientious observer could not but see that people voted almost unanimously for reunification with Russia.
I would like to ask those who do not want to recognise it: if our opponents call themselves democrats, I would like to ask what exactly democracy means. As far as I know, democracy is the rule of the people, or the rule based on the will of the people. So, the solution of the Crimean issue is based on the will of the people of the Crimea.
In Donetsk and Lugansk people voted for independence, and the situation there is different. But the main thing, something we must always bear in mind, is that we should always respect the feelings and the choice of the people. And if somebody wants these territories to remain part of Ukraine, they should prove to those people that their lives would be better, more comfortable and safer within a unified state; that they would be able to provide for themselves and ensure their children’s future within this state. But it is impossible to convince these people by means of weapons. These issues, issues of this kind can only be resolved by peaceful means.
Interview to the Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.
Interview to the Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.
Interview to the Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.
Paolo Valentino: Speaking of peace, the countries that used to be parties to the Warsaw Treaty and today are NATO countries, such as the Baltic states and Poland, feel threatened by Russia. NATO has decided to create special forces to address these concerns. My question is whether the West is right in its determination to restrain “the Russian bear”, and why does Russia continue to speak in such a contentious tone?
Vladimir Putin: Russia does not speak with anyone in a contentious tone, and in such matters, to quote a political figure from the past, Otto von Bismarck, it is not discussions but the potential that counts.
What does the actual potential show? US military spending is higher than that of all countries in the world taken together. The aggregate military spending of NATO countries is 10 times, note – 10 times higher than that of the Russian Federation. Russia has virtually no bases abroad. We have the remnants of our armed forces (since Soviet times) in Tajikistan, on the border with Afghanistan, which is an area where the terrorist threat is particularly high. The same role is played by our airbase in Kyrgyzstan; it is also aimed at addressing the terrorist threat and was set up at the request of the Kyrgyz authorities after a terrorist attack perpetrated by terrorists from Afghanistan on Kyrgyzstan.
We have kept since Soviet times a military unit at a base in Armenia. It plays a certain stabilising role in the region, but it is not targeted against anyone. We have dismantled our bases in various regions of the world, including Cuba, Vietnam, and so on. This means that our policy in this respect is not global, offensive or aggressive.
I invite you to publish the world map in your newspaper and to mark all the US military bases on it. You will see the difference.
Sometimes I am asked about our airplanes flying somewhere far, over the Atlantic Ocean. Patrolling by strategic airplanes in remote regions was carried out only by the Soviet Union and the United States during the Cold War. In the early 1990s, we, the new, modern Russia, stopped these flights, but our American friends continued to fly along our borders. Why? Some years ago, we resumed these flights. And you want to say that we have been aggressive?
American submarines are on permanent alert off the Norwegian coast; they are equipped with missiles that can reach Moscow in 17 minutes. But we dismantled all of our bases in Cuba a long time ago, even the non-strategic ones. And you would call us aggressive?
You yourself have mentioned NATO’s expansion to the east. As for us, we are not expanding anywhere; it is NATO infrastructure, including military infrastructure, that is moving towards our borders. Is this a manifestation of our aggression?
Finally, the United States unilaterally withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which was to a large extent the cornerstone of the entire international security system. Anti-missile systems, bases and radars are located in the European territory or in the sea, e.g. in the Mediterranean Sea, and in Alaska. We have said many times that this undermines international security. Do you think this is a display of our aggression as well?
Everything we do is just a response to the threats emerging against us. Besides, what we do is limited in scope and scale, which are, however, sufficient to ensure Russia's security. Or did someone expect Russia to disarm unilaterally?
I have proposed to our American partners not to withdraw from the treaty unilaterally, but to create an ABM system together, the three of us: Russia, the United States and Europe. But this proposal was declined. We said at the time: ”Well, this is an expensive system, its efficiency is not proven, but to ensure the strategic balance we will develop our strategic offensive potential, we will develop systems of overpowering anti-ballistic defence. And I have to say that we have made significant strides in this area.
As for some countries’ concerns about Russia's possible aggressive actions, I think that only an insane person and only in a dream can imagine that Russia would suddenly attack NATO. I think some countries are simply taking advantage of people’s fears with regard to Russia. They just want to play the role of front-line countries that should receive some supplementary military, economic, financial or some other aid. Therefore, it is pointless to support this idea; it is absolutely groundless. But some may be interested in fostering such fears. I can only make a conjecture.
For example, the Americans do not want Russia's rapprochement with Europe. I am not asserting this, it is just a hypothesis. Let’s suppose that the United States would like to maintain its leadership in the Atlantic community. It needs an external threat, an external enemy to ensure this leadership. Iran is clearly not enough – this threat is not very scary or big enough. Who can be frightening? And then suddenly this crisis unfolds in Ukraine. Russia is forced to respond. Perhaps, it was engineered on purpose, I don’t know. But it was not our doing.
Let me tell you something – there is no need to fear Russia. The world has changed so drastically that people with some common sense cannot even imagine such a large-scale military conflict today. We have other things to think about, I assure you.
Paolo Valentino: But you cooperate with the United States on Iran, and John Kerry's visit sent yet another message in this regard. Or am I wrong?
Vladimir Putin: You are right – it did. We are cooperating not only on the Iranian nuclear programme, but on other serious issues as well. Despite America's withdrawal from the ABM Treaty, our arms control dialogue continues.
We are not just partners; I would say we are allies in addressing the issues related to non‑proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. We are undoubtedly allies in the fight against terrorism. There are some other areas of collaboration as well. The central theme of Expo Milano, which you mentioned earlier, is yet another example of our joint work. Indeed, there are plenty of issues that we continue to tackle jointly.
Paolo Valentino: Mr Putin, on May 9, Russiamarked the 70th anniversary of the Great Victory, which liberated both your country and the entire Europe from Nazism. No other country paid as bloody a price for this victory as Russia. However, there were no Western leaders standing next to you on Red Square. Il Corriere della Sera published Silvio Berlusconi's letter criticising those leaders for their absence. I have two related questions.
Do you think that by their absence they showed disrespect for the Russian people? What does the memory of the Great Patriotic War mean to the Russian identity today?
Vladimir Putin: It is not a matter of identity. Identity is built on culture, language and history. This war is a tragic page in our history. When we mark such days, festive but also sad given the number of lives lost in that war, we think about the generation that made our freedom and independence possible, about those who triumphed over Nazism. We also think about the fact that no one has the right to forget this tragedy, first of all, because we must think about how to avoid the repetition of anything like that in the future. These are not just words; it is not an unfounded fear.
Today, we hear some people say that there was no such thing as the holocaust, for instance. We are witnessing attempts to glorify the Nazis and their collaborators. This is part of our life today. Today's terrorism in all its various manifestations is very much like Nazism; in fact, there is hardly any difference between the two.
As for the colleagues you have mentioned, it is their personal choice, of course, whether to come to Moscow to join in the celebrations or not. I think that they failed to see past the current complexity in international relations to something far more important that is linked not only to the past, but also to the need to fight for our common future.
They made their choice, but this day is, first and foremost, our holiday. You see, there were veterans from quite a number of countries in Moscow: from the United States, Great Britain, Poland and other European countries. In fact, it is these people who are the true heroes of this day, and this was very important to us. During those celebrations, we did not honour only those who fought Nazism in the Soviet Union; we also remembered the Resistance fighters in Germany itself, in France and in Italy. We remember all of them and pay tribute to all the people who did not spare themselves in the fight against Nazism.
Certainly, we understand only too well that it was the Soviet Union that made the decisive contribution into the Victory and suffered the most severe losses in the fight against Nazism. It is more than just a military victory to us, it is a moral victory. You see, virtually every family lost someone in the war. How can we forget this? It is impossible.
Paolo Valentino: There are a few more quick questions left.
Vladimir Putin: I hope they are quick indeed.
During interview to Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.
During interview to Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.
During interview to Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.
Luciano Fontana: You are a very popular leader in Russia, but in other countries and even in your own country you are often called authoritarian. Why is it so difficult to be part of the opposition in Russia?
Vladimir Putin: What is so difficult about it? If the opposition proves that it can tackle the challenges faced by a district, a region or the whole country, then, I think, people will always notice it.
The number of parties in our country has multiplied, in recent years we liberalised the process of establishing a political party and taking it to a regional and national level. It is all about their competence and ability to work with the electorate, to work with people.
Paolo Valentino: Then why are members of the opposition so rarely interviewed by the main Russian TV channels?
Vladimir Putin: I think if they have something interesting to say, they will be interviewed more often.
As for political competition, we know that various means are used against political rivals. Just take a look at the most recent history of Italy.
Paolo Valentino: Mr President, Greece is facing huge difficulties in its relations with Europe. If Greece leaves the eurozone, will Russia be ready to offer it political and economical assistance?
Vladimir Putin: We are building our relations with Greece irrespective of whether it is an EU, eurozone or NATO member. We have very close historical and good partnership relations with Greece, which is why it is up to the Greek people to make a sovereign decision as to which union and zone to be part of. But we don’t know what will happen in the future, so it would be wrong or even harmful for both Greek and European economies if we, as the saying goes, try to read the tea leaves.
For an economy like Greece there are certain difficulties brought about by the common European rules. They cannot devalue the drachma because they don't have it, they are strictly pegged to the euro currency. Their boundaries are fully open for European goods, which gives a distinct advantage to the export-oriented economies. Common decisions are made concerning such sectors as agriculture and fishery, where Greece could have certain competitive advantages but there are limits as well.
Another sector where it has an advantage is tourism, of course, but it applies to the Schengen area and there are also some limits. We have a visa-free arrangement with Turkey and 5 million Russian tourists visited this country last year, while less than one million tourists visited Greece, around 300,000, as far as I know. However, Greece receives concessional loans, financial support from the European treasury, and it has access to the European labour market. There are also other benefits of being part of the European family.
It is not up to us here in Russia to decide what is more beneficial and preferable for Greece. Once again, it is up to the Greek people to make a sovereign decision in dialogue with their main European partners.
Paolo Valentino: I would like to ask the last two small questions.
Vladimir Putin: Are we going to stay here until morning?
Paolo Valentino: We can see four Russian emperors here, in this room. Which historical figure inspires you the most?
Vladimir Putin: You know, people ask me this question a lot. I prefer to dodge it since the answer can give rise to various interpretations. (Laughs)
So I will put it like this: I try not to idolise anybody. I try, or rather, I am guided by the interests of the Russian people in my work, taking into account everything that has been previously accumulated and the conditions we are living in today, and I try to get a glimpse of the way we should build our life, economy and policy – first and foremost, our domestic policy – as well as our foreign policy in the medium and long-term strategic perspective.
There are many good examples in both Russian and European history, as well as in world history. But all those people lived and worked in certain conditions. The most important thing is to be honest with yourself and with the people who have entrusted you with this work.
Luciano Fontana: One last question. What is your biggest regret in life? What do you consider a mistake that you would never want to make again?
Vladimir Putin: I will be quite frank with you. I cannot recollect anything of the kind. By the grace of God, I have nothing to regret in my life.
Question: You are a happy person.
Vladimir Putin: I am, thank God.